In the fast-paced world of fashion, not every brand can keep up—and 2025 proved that in a big way. While some labels soared by blending style, comfort, and innovation, others… well, stumbled hard. Whether they clung to outdated designs, missed the memo on what real women actually want to wear, or priced themselves out of relevance, these brands just didn’t deliver.
From clunky silhouettes and questionable quality to tone-deaf pricing strategies, the following 7 shoe brands fell flat with consumers this year—and we’re breaking down exactly what went wrong. If you’ve been frustrated with a pair that didn’t live up to the hype or noticed a once-beloved brand suddenly feeling “off,” chances are you’ll spot them on this list.
Because when it comes to shoes in 2025, looking good isn’t enough—they need to feel right, function well, and reflect the moment we’re in.
1. Aldo
Known for trendy design, Aldo shoes often catch the eye. However, frequent complaints about quality issues have tarnished its reputation. Many customers found their shoes falling apart after minimal use. Moisture exposure leading to color bleeding added to their woes. Annoyingly inconsistent sizing became a common grievance, frustrating many.
Customer service, once a point of pride, seemed to falter, as patrons struggled to secure refunds or exchanges. This disheartening experience left many feeling undervalued. The once sought-after brand struggled to retain its loyal customer base.
2. Nine West
What happened to Nine West? Once a staple, its decline in quality became apparent. Customers reported discomfort, with some shoes causing painful blisters. The feeling of walking barefoot became a too-common sentiment. Poor construction, like heels detaching, plagued the brand. Material peeling prematurely only exacerbated dissatisfaction.
Once reliable, Nine West surrendered trust as patrons sought alternatives. The allure of style couldn’t compensate for these flaws, and the brand’s spark faded.
3. Michael Kors
Luxury meets discomfort in Michael Kors shoes. Blisters and tight fits became common complaints, overshadowing the brand’s prestige. Customers struggled with the lack of support, a stark contrast to the brand’s luxury image.
Returns and exchanges became a sore point, leaving many buyers unsatisfied. Despite its reputation, the brand’s footwear failed to meet expectations. As the allure of the brand waned, customers sought comfort elsewhere, tarnishing Michael Kors’ once-esteemed name in fashion.
4. UGG
UGG boots once defined winter fashion with their distinctive style. Yet, experts warned of foot health concerns due to inadequate arch support. Issues like plantar fasciitis arose, troubling loyal wearers. Incorrect orders and customer service struggles further marred the brand’s image.
The cozy appeal couldn’t mask the discomfort, and long-time customers began reconsidering their loyalty. For a brand synonymous with comfort, these problems were particularly damaging, leading to a decline in their faithful following.
5. Kenneth Cole
Elegance without endurance: Kenneth Cole shoes struggled to deliver value. Rapid wear and tear disappointed customers expecting longevity. Comfort took a back seat to aesthetics, frustrating wearers.
Priced as a premium product, the experience fell short of expectations. In a market where durability matters, Kenneth Cole’s appeal diminished. For many, the stylish designs no longer justified the purchase, leading to a plummet in customer confidence.
6. Skechers
Skechers, known for diverse styles, faced scrutiny over durability. Shoes wearing out quickly left many disillusioned. Insufficient arch support led to discomfort, affecting long-term wearers. Customers expected more from a brand touted for comfort.
As these issues became prevalent, loyalty waned. While style kept them relevant, the lack of durability disappointed many, signaling a need for change.
7. Converse
Iconic yet lacking: Converse sneakers, famous for their style, missed the comfort mark. Minimal cushioning failed to support prolonged wear, causing discomfort. Arch support and shock absorption were notably absent.
While style kept them iconic, the practical needs of customers were unmet. Those seeking both fashion and functionality turned away, leaving Converse needing to rethink its approach.